Militarism in WW1: Why It Started (And How It Ended)

The fervent nationalism prevalent in early 20th-century Europe fueled a widespread adoption of militaristic policies. Understanding what is militarism in world war 1 requires examining how this ideology propelled nations toward conflict. The Schlieffen Plan, a German strategic scheme, exemplifies the military planning that shaped the war's initial stages. Concurrently, the escalating production of artillery, like the infamous Big Bertha, symbolized the arms race and the destructive capabilities that defined the conflict. These interconnected elements help explain what is militarism in world war 1 and how it intertwined with the broader political and social landscape of the era.

Image taken from the YouTube channel Heimler's History , from the video titled The CAUSES of World War I, Explained [AP World History Review—Unit 7 Topic 2] .

Dissecting Militarism in World War I: Origins and Decline

The First World War, a global conflict of unprecedented scale, was influenced by many factors. One of the most significant was militarism. Understanding "what is militarism in World War 1" is crucial to comprehending the war's origins and eventual resolution. This explanation will explore its core tenets, manifestations, and eventual decline.

Defining Militarism in the Context of World War I

Militarism, in its simplest form, is the belief that a nation should maintain a strong military capability and be prepared to use it aggressively to defend or promote national interests. In the pre-World War I environment, this took on specific characteristics:

• Glorification of Military Power: An overemphasis on the prestige and importance of the armed forces within society. This included parades, public displays of military strength, and the elevation of military leaders to positions of high esteem.
• Arms Race: A competitive buildup of military arsenals between nations, fuelled by suspicion and a desire to maintain a perceived advantage.
• Influence of Military on Policy: The military establishment exerted significant influence over government policies, often advocating for aggressive foreign policy and increased military spending.
• Belief in the Inevitability of War: A widespread belief that war was not only possible but also a desirable means of resolving international disputes.

Key Components of Pre-War Militarism

These can be summarised in the following table:

The Rise of Militarism: Causes and Contributing Factors

Several factors contributed to the rise of militarism in the years leading up to World War I.

1. Nationalism: Intense national pride and a belief in one's nation's superiority fueled a desire for expansion and dominance. This often manifested in aggressive foreign policy and territorial ambitions.
2. Imperialism: Competition for colonies and resources created tensions between European powers, prompting them to strengthen their military capabilities to protect their interests.
3. Alliance System: The complex web of alliances between European nations meant that a conflict between two countries could quickly escalate into a larger war, increasing the perceived need for military preparedness.
4. Social Darwinism: The application of Darwinian principles to international relations, suggesting that nations were engaged in a struggle for survival, further legitimized military expansion and aggression.

The Role of Nationalism

Nationalism heightened rivalries and fostered the perception that military strength was essential for national survival. Nations sought to assert their dominance and protect their interests through military buildup and assertive foreign policies.

Imperialism and its Military Implications

Imperial competition directly linked to militarism. Acquiring and defending colonies required powerful navies and armies, leading to increased military spending and a focus on military strategy.

How Militarism Shaped the Course of World War I

Militarism's influence on the war was profound. It shaped military strategies, influenced political decisions, and contributed to the war's length and intensity.

• Offensive Military Strategies: The belief in quick, decisive victories led to the development of aggressive military plans, such as the Schlieffen Plan, which prioritized offensive operations. These plans often underestimated the defensive capabilities of modern weaponry, leading to prolonged and devastating trench warfare.
• Total War: The militaristic mindset extended beyond the battlefield, impacting civilian life. Governments mobilized entire populations and economies for the war effort, blurring the lines between combatants and non-combatants.
• Unrestricted Submarine Warfare: Germany's decision to engage in unrestricted submarine warfare, targeting civilian vessels, demonstrated the extent to which military considerations superseded ethical and diplomatic concerns.

The Decline of Militarism: Post-War Developments

The horrors of World War I led to a reassessment of militarism and its role in international relations. Several factors contributed to its decline:

1. The Treaty of Versailles: Imposed strict limitations on Germany's military capabilities, aiming to prevent future aggression.
2. The League of Nations: Established to promote international cooperation and prevent future wars through diplomacy and collective security. Though ultimately ineffective, its creation signaled a shift away from reliance on military solutions.
3. Pacifist Movements: Gained momentum in the aftermath of the war, advocating for disarmament and non-violent conflict resolution.
4. Economic Costs: The immense financial burden of the war highlighted the economic costs of militarism and the need for alternative approaches to international relations.

The Legacy of the Treaty of Versailles

While intended to curb German militarism, the Treaty of Versailles ultimately contributed to resentment and instability, creating conditions that would later contribute to the rise of Nazi Germany and World War II.

The Impact of the League of Nations

The League's failure to prevent aggression in the 1930s revealed the limitations of collective security and the challenges of overcoming entrenched militaristic tendencies.

While militarism did not disappear entirely after World War I, its influence was significantly diminished. The war's devastation served as a stark reminder of the dangers of unchecked military power and the need for alternative approaches to international relations.

Video: Militarism in WW1: Why It Started (And How It Ended)

Play Video

So, hopefully, you've got a better grasp of what is militarism in world war 1 now. It's a complex topic with lots of moving parts, but understanding its roots and consequences is super important for understanding the war itself. Thanks for diving in!