Balfour Declaration: How Did It Change the Middle East?

The Balfour Declaration, a pivotal statement, fundamentally reshaped the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East. British Mandate for Palestine, a subsequent administrative framework, directly implemented aspects of the declaration. Zionist Movement, a significant force, actively promoted Jewish statehood. But, how did the Balfour Declaration affect the Middle East? This article presents a detailed analysis examining these entities and the long-term implications of its issuance.

Image taken from the YouTube channel Al Jazeera English , from the video titled The Balfour Declaration explained .

The Balfour Declaration, a concise but consequential document issued in 1917, remains a central point of reference in understanding the modern Middle East. Its historical significance is undeniable, as it fundamentally altered the region's trajectory.

This declaration, a letter from British Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour to Lord Walter Rothschild, expressed the British government's support for the establishment of a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine.

The reverberations of this declaration continue to be felt today. It laid the groundwork for the creation of the State of Israel and simultaneously ignited a conflict that has defined the region for over a century.

This article will delve into the multifaceted ways in which the Balfour Declaration affected the Middle East. We will examine its immediate consequences and its enduring impact on the region's political, social, and cultural landscape.

A Promise, A Conflict: Understanding the Declaration's Impact

The Balfour Declaration's legacy is not one of simple fulfillment or straightforward progress. Rather, it is a complex narrative woven with threads of aspiration, displacement, and enduring conflict.

The declaration's promise of a Jewish homeland was met with jubilation by Zionist organizations worldwide. This fueled a wave of immigration to Palestine and fostered the growth of Jewish institutions and communities.

However, this promise also directly contradicted existing realities on the ground. Palestine was already inhabited by a predominantly Arab population. The declaration made no explicit provision for their political rights or national aspirations.

The Seeds of Discord

The inherent ambiguity of the Balfour Declaration—particularly the phrase "national home," which lacked a clear definition—allowed for widely divergent interpretations. This ultimately sowed the seeds of discord between Jewish and Arab communities.

The failure to adequately address the rights and concerns of the existing Arab population created a breeding ground for resentment and resistance. This laid the foundation for the protracted Israeli-Palestinian conflict that continues to shape the region today.

Ongoing Debates and Controversies

The Balfour Declaration is far from a settled historical matter. It remains a subject of intense debate and controversy.

Some view it as a crucial step toward rectifying historical injustices against the Jewish people. They argue that it provided a vital haven for those fleeing persecution and discrimination in Europe.

Others condemn it as a colonial betrayal that disregarded the rights and aspirations of the Palestinian people. They highlight the declaration's role in the displacement and dispossession of Palestinians, arguing that its legacy is one of ongoing injustice.

These conflicting interpretations underscore the enduring relevance of the Balfour Declaration. It serves as a constant reminder of the complex and contested history of the Middle East. Understanding its legacy is essential for navigating the region's current challenges and striving for a more just and peaceful future.

The inherent ambiguity of the Balfour Declaration becomes even more pronounced when viewed through the lens of the period in which it was conceived. To fully grasp its implications, it is essential to understand the complex geopolitical landscape of the Middle East during World War I, the waning influence of the Ottoman Empire, and the convergence of competing interests and national aspirations.

A Region in Turmoil: The Historical Context of the Balfour Declaration

World War I irrevocably reshaped the global order, and the Middle East was no exception. The region, largely under the control of the Ottoman Empire, became a crucial theater of conflict, drawing in the major European powers. Understanding the Ottoman Empire's weakening grip and the ensuing power vacuum is critical to understanding the Balfour Declaration.

The Middle East During World War I

At the outbreak of World War I, the Middle East was predominantly under the control of the Ottoman Empire, a vast, multi-ethnic empire that had been steadily declining for centuries. The Ottomans' decision to side with the Central Powers (Germany and Austria-Hungary) against the Allied Powers (Great Britain, France, and Russia) proved to be a pivotal moment.

The Allied Powers recognized the strategic importance of the Middle East, particularly the Suez Canal, a vital shipping route connecting Europe to Asia. This led to a flurry of diplomatic activity and strategic maneuvering aimed at undermining Ottoman control and securing Allied interests.

The Decline of the Ottoman Empire and Conflicting Promises

The war effort placed immense strain on the already fragile Ottoman Empire. Internal dissent, coupled with external pressures from the Allied forces, accelerated its decline. This decline created a power vacuum that the British sought to exploit.

The British government engaged in a complex game of diplomacy, making competing promises to different groups in the region to further their strategic goals.

The Hussein-McMahon Correspondence

One of the most significant of these promises was the Hussein-McMahon Correspondence (1915-1916), in which the British High Commissioner in Egypt, Sir Henry McMahon, exchanged letters with Hussein bin Ali, the Sharif of Mecca. In these letters, McMahon appeared to promise British support for an independent Arab kingdom in a large swathe of territory, including Palestine, in exchange for Arab support against the Ottoman Empire.

The Sykes-Picot Agreement

However, the British were also secretly negotiating with France and Russia to divide up the Ottoman territories after the war. This led to the Sykes-Picot Agreement (1916), a secret agreement that carved up the Middle East into spheres of influence for Britain and France, contradicting the promises made to the Arabs.

The inherent contradictions between the Hussein-McMahon Correspondence and the Sykes-Picot Agreement laid the foundation for future conflict and resentment in the region.

The Rise of Zionism and the Desire for a Jewish Homeland

Concurrent with these developments was the rise of Zionism, a nationalist movement that advocated for the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine.

The Zionist movement gained momentum in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, fueled by a combination of factors, including:

• Rising antisemitism in Europe.
• A longing for a return to Zion (Jerusalem).
• The belief in self-determination for the Jewish people.

Zionist leaders, such as Chaim Weizmann, actively lobbied the British government for support in establishing a Jewish homeland in Palestine. They argued that Palestine held deep historical and religious significance for the Jewish people and that a Jewish state would serve as a refuge from persecution.

Lord Balfour and British Motivations

Lord Arthur James Balfour, the British Foreign Secretary, played a crucial role in issuing the Balfour Declaration. Several factors influenced the British government's decision to support the Zionist cause.

Strategic Considerations

The British believed that a Jewish homeland in Palestine could serve as a strategic asset for the British Empire, helping to protect the Suez Canal and maintain British influence in the region.

Sympathy for the Zionist Cause

Some British officials, including Balfour himself, were genuinely sympathetic to the Zionist cause and believed that the Jewish people deserved a homeland of their own.

Propaganda and Public Opinion

The British also hoped that supporting the Zionist cause would garner support from Jewish communities around the world, particularly in the United States and Russia, which were crucial to the Allied war effort.

The confluence of these factors led to the issuance of the Balfour Declaration, a decision that would have profound and lasting consequences for the Middle East. It is crucial to note that the Balfour Declaration was not solely driven by altruism. Strategic calculations, imperial ambitions, and domestic political considerations all played a significant role. This understanding is vital for contextualizing the declaration's subsequent impact on the region.

The war effort placed immense strain on the already fragile Ottoman Empire, creating opportunities for the Allies to advance their interests. But before we can understand the consequences and the complicated aftermath, it's vital to examine the Declaration itself and delve deeper into the meaning behind its carefully chosen words.

Decoding the Declaration: A Closer Examination

The Balfour Declaration, a concise 67-word statement, carries within it a weight of historical significance and enduring controversy. Understanding its lasting impact requires a meticulous examination of its language, a dissection of its key phrases, and an awareness of the ambiguities that have fueled decades of debate.

The full text of the Balfour Declaration reads:

"His Majesty's government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country."

The "National Home" Ambiguity

Perhaps the most debated phrase within the Declaration is "national home." The British government deliberately avoided using the term "state," a decision that has been interpreted in various ways.

Some argue that the intention was never to create a fully sovereign Jewish state, while others maintain that a "national home" was understood as a precursor to eventual statehood.

The ambiguity allowed for multiple interpretations, satisfying Zionist aspirations to some extent, while also attempting to assuage concerns about displacing the existing Arab population.

This lack of clarity, however, laid the groundwork for future conflict.

"Civil and Religious Rights": A Safeguard with Limitations

The Declaration includes a caveat regarding the "civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine." This clause was ostensibly intended to protect the rights of the Arab population, who constituted the vast majority of Palestine's inhabitants at the time.

However, the wording is vague and lacks concrete mechanisms for enforcement.

The Declaration does not explicitly define what constitutes a "civil right" or how these rights would be protected in practice.

This ambiguity, coupled with the overarching commitment to establishing a Jewish national home, created a tension that would ultimately prove irreconcilable.

Conflicting Interpretations and Unintended Consequences

The Balfour Declaration's carefully crafted language, while seemingly straightforward, lent itself to conflicting interpretations from the outset.

For Zionists, it represented a crucial step towards realizing their long-held dream of establishing a Jewish state in their ancestral homeland. It was a promise of international recognition and support.

For the Arab population of Palestine, the Declaration was viewed as a betrayal, a promise to a foreign entity that disregarded their rights and aspirations.

It threatened their existing way of life and ignited fears of displacement and dispossession.

For the British, the Declaration was a strategic maneuver, aimed at securing their interests in the Middle East during World War I.

They sought to gain Jewish support for the Allied cause and to establish a British presence in Palestine.

The conflicting interpretations of the Balfour Declaration, coupled with its inherent ambiguities, set the stage for decades of conflict and political instability in the region. It is a testament to the power of language and the enduring consequences of decisions made in the crucible of war.

His Majesty's Government had spoken, and the world, particularly the inhabitants of Palestine, held its breath. The ramifications of those 67 words were immediate, setting in motion a series of reactions and events that would forever alter the course of history in the region.

Immediate Repercussions: Initial Impacts on Palestine

The Balfour Declaration sent shockwaves through Palestine, eliciting sharply contrasting responses from its diverse communities. The initial period following its publication was marked by a complex interplay of hope, apprehension, and nascent conflict.

Reactions from Key Groups

The Jewish community in Palestine, though a minority, greeted the Declaration with jubilation. For many, it represented the long-awaited promise of a return to their ancestral homeland and the opportunity to rebuild a national life. Zionist organizations began to mobilize, eager to capitalize on the British endorsement and initiate concrete steps towards establishing a "national home."

The Arab population, comprising the majority in Palestine, viewed the Declaration with deep concern and resentment. They perceived it as a betrayal of promises made to them during the war, fearing that it foreshadowed the displacement and dispossession of their community. Arab leaders and intellectuals began to organize protests and express their opposition to the Declaration, laying the groundwork for future resistance.

The British, now holding a mandate over Palestine, found themselves in a precarious position, tasked with implementing a policy that satisfied neither the Zionist aspirations nor the Arab concerns. Their initial reaction was characterized by a mixture of cautious optimism and growing unease, as they struggled to navigate the conflicting demands and manage the escalating tensions on the ground.

The Tide of Immigration

One of the most immediate and visible consequences of the Balfour Declaration was a significant increase in Jewish immigration to Palestine. Encouraged by the prospect of a "national home" and fueled by Zionist fervor, Jews from Europe and other parts of the world began to arrive in increasing numbers.

This influx of immigrants, while welcomed by the Jewish community, further exacerbated Arab anxieties. The growing Jewish presence fueled fears of land confiscation, economic marginalization, and ultimately, the loss of their cultural and political dominance in Palestine.

Rising Tensions

The demographic shifts and competing national aspirations inevitably led to increased friction between the Jewish and Arab communities. Disputes over land ownership, access to resources, and political representation became more frequent and intense.

Isolated incidents of violence began to escalate, foreshadowing the larger-scale conflicts that would engulf Palestine in the years to come. The seeds of a long and bitter struggle were sown in the immediate aftermath of the Balfour Declaration.

The Role of Zionist Leadership

Chaim Weizmann, a prominent Zionist leader and scientist, played a crucial role in securing the Balfour Declaration and subsequently promoting Jewish immigration and development in Palestine. He and other Zionist leaders worked tirelessly to establish institutions, acquire land, and build infrastructure to support the growing Jewish community.

Their efforts, while contributing to the development of Palestine, also fueled Arab resentment, who viewed them as actively working to undermine their rights and interests. The actions of Zionist leaders, while driven by a vision of a Jewish homeland, inadvertently contributed to the escalating tensions and the deepening divide between the two communities.

His initial unease quickly evolved into a pragmatic strategy of balancing competing interests, a strategy that would prove increasingly difficult to maintain in the years to come. As the dust settled from the initial shockwaves of the Balfour Declaration, the stage was set for a new chapter in the history of Palestine – one defined by British rule and escalating tensions.

The Mandate Era: British Rule and Growing Instability

The Balfour Declaration, initially a statement of intent, soon morphed into the cornerstone of the British Mandate for Palestine. This international agreement, formalized by the League of Nations in 1922, entrusted Britain with the administration of Palestine.

The Mandate agreement explicitly incorporated the Balfour Declaration, obligating Britain to facilitate the establishment of a Jewish national home while also safeguarding the civil and religious rights of the existing non-Jewish communities. This dual mandate, seemingly contradictory from its inception, became the source of immense challenges for British rule.

The Tightrope Walk: Governing Conflicting Aspirations

The British Mandate was characterized by the near-impossible task of reconciling the national aspirations of two distinct populations.

The Zionist movement, emboldened by the Balfour Declaration, sought to increase Jewish immigration and acquire land for settlement, viewing this as essential for the realization of their national home.

Conversely, the Arab population, who constituted the majority, increasingly viewed Jewish immigration and land acquisition as a direct threat to their own national identity and future in Palestine.

The British found themselves caught in the middle, attempting to mediate between these opposing forces while simultaneously pursuing their own strategic interests in the region.

The inherent contradiction in the Mandate – promoting Jewish national aspirations while protecting the rights of the Arab population – proved to be an insurmountable obstacle to peaceful governance.

Escalating Tensions: Violence and Political Upheaval

The conflicting national aspirations inevitably led to increased violence and political instability throughout the Mandate period.

Early Clashes and Riots

From the early 1920s, clashes between Jewish and Arab communities became increasingly frequent and violent. The 1920 Nebi Musa riots and the 1921 Jaffa riots were early warning signs of the escalating tensions. These events highlighted the deep-seated animosity and the fragility of the British administration's control.

The 1929 Wailing Wall Disturbances

The 1929 Wailing Wall disturbances, sparked by a dispute over access to the Western Wall in Jerusalem, resulted in widespread violence and numerous deaths. The riots underscored the religious dimension of the conflict and further eroded trust between the communities.

The Arab Revolt (1936-1939)

The Arab Revolt of 1936-1939 marked a significant turning point in the conflict. Driven by a desire for independence and opposition to Jewish immigration, Arab nationalists launched a widespread uprising against British rule.

The revolt was brutally suppressed by the British, leading to further radicalization of the Arab population and a deepening sense of grievance. The British response, characterized by collective punishment and the use of force, further inflamed tensions.

The Peel Commission and the Partition Proposal

In response to the escalating violence, the British government established the Peel Commission in 1937 to investigate the causes of the unrest. The commission concluded that the conflict was irreconcilable and recommended the partition of Palestine into separate Arab and Jewish states.

While the Zionist leadership reluctantly accepted the principle of partition, the Arab leadership rejected the proposal outright, viewing it as a betrayal of their national rights. The Peel Commission's report, rather than resolving the conflict, further entrenched the divisions and fueled the cycle of violence.

The British Mandate, intended to guide Palestine towards self-governance, instead became a period of increasing instability and conflict. The Balfour Declaration, enshrined within the Mandate, ultimately sowed the seeds of a future conflict, leaving a legacy of division and resentment that continues to shape the region today.

The British found themselves caught in the middle, attempting to mediate between these opposing forces, often resorting to policies that satisfied neither side. This delicate balancing act, fraught with peril, proved unsustainable in the long run, setting the stage for increased unrest and a growing sense of disillusionment among both Arabs and Jews in Palestine. The consequences of this early mismanagement would reverberate through the region for decades to come.

Fueling Nationalism: The Rise of Arab National Identity

The Balfour Declaration, intended to address the aspirations of the Jewish people, inadvertently acted as a catalyst for the burgeoning sense of Arab national identity in Palestine and the wider Middle East.

The declaration and the subsequent British policies fostered a sense of shared grievance and a collective desire for self-determination among the Arab population. What began as localized resistance gradually transformed into a unified national movement, seeking to assert Arab rights and independence.

Seeds of Discontent: The Balfour Declaration as a Unifying Force

Prior to the Balfour Declaration, Arab identity in Palestine was often fragmented, characterized by local allegiances and familial ties.

The declaration, however, provided a common cause, uniting Arabs across social and geographical divides in opposition to what they perceived as a grave injustice.

The perceived imposition of a foreign agenda on their homeland fostered a sense of shared victimhood and a collective determination to resist.

The Erosion of Trust: Resentment Towards European Powers

The Balfour Declaration further fueled existing resentment towards European powers, particularly Britain and France, who were seen as pursuing their own colonial interests at the expense of Arab self-determination.

The Sykes-Picot Agreement, a secret pact that divided the Ottoman territories between Britain and France, had already sown seeds of distrust.

The Balfour Declaration only deepened this sense of betrayal, confirming the belief that European powers were not genuine allies but rather self-serving imperialists. This conviction spurred the growth of Arab nationalist movements aimed at expelling European influence from the region.

The Quest for Self-Determination: From Resistance to Revolution

The growing Arab nationalism manifested itself in various forms of resistance, ranging from peaceful protests and demonstrations to armed uprisings and organized political movements.

The Arab Revolt of 1936-1939, a widespread rebellion against British rule and increased Jewish immigration, exemplified the intensity of Arab opposition and the growing desire for self-determination.

This revolt, though ultimately suppressed by the British, served as a watershed moment, solidifying Arab national identity and paving the way for future struggles for independence.

Leaders like Hajj Amin al-Husseini emerged as powerful figures, galvanizing Arab support and articulating the demands for an independent Palestine.

The Legacy of Nationalism: Shaping the Modern Middle East

The rise of Arab nationalism, triggered in part by the Balfour Declaration, profoundly shaped the political landscape of the Middle East.

It fueled movements for independence across the region, leading to the dismantling of colonial empires and the emergence of new Arab nation-states.

However, the unresolved issues stemming from the Balfour Declaration, such as the Palestinian question, continue to be a major source of instability and conflict in the region, underscoring the enduring legacy of this pivotal moment in history.

The quest for self-determination, ignited by the declaration, continues to resonate today, shaping the political aspirations and national identities of millions of Arabs.

Fueling Arab resentment and a desire for self-determination, the repercussions of the Balfour Declaration reverberated across the region. Its impact, however, extended far beyond sentiment, ultimately shaping the very map of the Middle East and birthing a new nation amidst a landscape of displacement and conflict.

A Nation Emerges: The Creation of Israel and Its Consequences

The culmination of Zionist aspirations and the unraveling of British control in Palestine reached a critical juncture in 1947. The United Nations, recognizing the intractable nature of the conflict, proposed a partition plan dividing Palestine into separate Arab and Jewish states. While the Zionist leadership accepted the plan, the Arab Higher Committee rejected it, setting the stage for an inevitable confrontation.

The Road to 1948: Partition and Conflict

The period leading up to May 14, 1948, witnessed escalating violence between Jewish and Arab militias. The Arab Liberation Army, composed of volunteers from neighboring Arab countries, joined the fight against Zionist forces. However, the better-organized and equipped Haganah, the main Jewish paramilitary group, gradually gained the upper hand.

As the British Mandate drew to a close, David Ben-Gurion, the head of the Jewish Agency, declared the establishment of the State of Israel on May 14, 1948. This declaration triggered the immediate invasion by the armies of neighboring Arab states – Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq, marking the beginning of the first Arab-Israeli War.

The Balfour Declaration's Role in Shaping the Political Landscape

The Balfour Declaration, with its promise of a "national home for the Jewish people," served as a crucial cornerstone for the Zionist movement's legitimacy in the international arena. It provided the initial impetus for Jewish immigration to Palestine and the subsequent development of Jewish institutions and infrastructure.

Without the Balfour Declaration, the Zionist project may not have garnered the necessary international support to materialize into a sovereign state. The declaration, therefore, played a pivotal role in shaping the political landscape, paving the way for the eventual creation of Israel.

The Palestinian Displacement: The Nakba

The creation of Israel was accompanied by the displacement and dispossession of a large portion of the Palestinian Arab population. This event, known as the Nakba (catastrophe) by Palestinians, resulted in the flight or expulsion of an estimated 700,000 Palestinians from their homes.

These refugees sought shelter in neighboring Arab countries, where many remain in refugee camps to this day. The Nakba remains a central point of contention in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It continues to fuel Palestinian national aspirations for the right of return.

The Ongoing Conflict: A Legacy of Displacement and Resentment

The 1948 Arab-Israeli War resulted in a decisive Israeli victory. Israel expanded its territory beyond the boundaries proposed by the UN partition plan. However, the conflict also left a legacy of unresolved issues, including the status of Palestinian refugees, the borders of Israel, and the control of Jerusalem.

These issues continue to fuel the ongoing conflict between Israelis and Palestinians, marked by cycles of violence and failed peace negotiations. The Balfour Declaration, therefore, remains a significant, if controversial, factor in understanding the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

David Lloyd George: Architect of a New Middle East?

David Lloyd George, the British Prime Minister during the issuance of the Balfour Declaration, played a significant role in shaping the events that led to the creation of Israel. His support for Zionism was influenced by a combination of factors, including strategic considerations, religious beliefs, and a desire to secure British interests in the Middle East.

Lloyd George's commitment to the Balfour Declaration solidified British policy in Palestine. This ultimately set the stage for the events of 1948 and the subsequent conflict. His actions continue to be debated and analyzed in the context of the enduring legacy of the Balfour Declaration.

Lasting Scars: Long-Term Effects on the Middle East

The echoes of the Balfour Declaration continue to reverberate across the Middle East, shaping its political landscape and fueling persistent instability. Its legacy is not merely a historical footnote, but a living force that contributes to the region's complex challenges. The unresolved issues of borders, refugees, and national identity, intertwined with the involvement of external powers, stand as stark reminders of the declaration's enduring impact.

The Unsettled Borders and Enduring Conflicts

The creation of Israel in 1948, a direct consequence of the Zionist aspirations fostered by the Balfour Declaration, led to the displacement of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians. This Nakba, or catastrophe, redrew the map of the region and sowed the seeds of enduring conflict.

Borders remained contested, and the absence of a just and lasting resolution to the Palestinian question has fueled repeated wars and uprisings.

The Six-Day War in 1967 further complicated the situation, with Israel's occupation of the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem. These actions led to further Palestinian displacement and entrenchment of the occupation.

These territorial disputes continue to be major obstacles to peace.

The Refugee Crisis: A Humanitarian and Political Challenge

The Palestinian refugee crisis, born from the events of 1948 and 1967, remains one of the most protracted humanitarian and political challenges in the world.

Millions of Palestinians continue to live in refugee camps in neighboring countries, often in conditions of poverty and marginalization.

The right of return, a core demand of the Palestinian people, remains a contentious issue. It is a major impediment to any lasting peace agreement with Israel.

The refugee crisis is not just a humanitarian problem, but a potent symbol of the unresolved injustices stemming from the creation of Israel.

National Identity and the Struggle for Self-Determination

The Balfour Declaration's impact extends beyond borders and refugees, deeply influencing the struggle for national identity in the region. The declaration ignited Arab nationalism. The intent was to counteract the perceived encroachment of European powers and the Zionist movement on Arab lands.

The failure to achieve full self-determination for the Palestinian people has fostered a sense of grievance and resentment, contributing to radicalization and violence.

The rise of extremist groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah is, in part, a consequence of the perceived failure of mainstream political movements to achieve Palestinian national aspirations.

External Powers: A History of Intervention

The Middle East has long been a playground for external powers, each seeking to advance their strategic interests. The Balfour Declaration itself was a product of British imperial ambitions during World War I.

The subsequent involvement of the United States, the Soviet Union (later Russia), and other nations has further complicated the region's political dynamics.

These external actors have often supported different sides in regional conflicts, exacerbating tensions and hindering efforts to achieve lasting peace. The ongoing conflicts in Syria, Yemen, and Libya are, in part, a result of this external interference.

The legacy of the Balfour Declaration cannot be understood in isolation. It exists within a broader context of colonial history and great power competition. The declaration's long-term effects underscore the importance of addressing the underlying issues of borders, refugees, and national identity. Without such resolution, the region will likely continue to be plagued by instability and conflict.

Video: Balfour Declaration: How Did It Change the Middle East?

Play Video

So, there you have it – a deep dive into how did the Balfour Declaration affect the Middle East! Hopefully, this gives you a clearer picture of its impact. Keep exploring this complex history!